Rungekutta in numbers
|
all inv. masses |
< 140 |
>= 150 |
raw data |
12524.5 |
11812.5 |
712.209 |
for comparison kickplane analysis:
http://hades-wiki.gsi.de/cgi-bin/view/SimAna/ResultsForINPC#Number_of_pairs
ths number of pairs in pi0 is lower, however above 150, the number of pairs is higher.
systematic errors SIMULATION (PLUTO)
1.
14% - PLUTO parametrization (variation of blast/isotropic/...) ->

2.
16% -

multiplicities - TAPS number ->
3.
11% -

multiplicities - TAPS number ->

=

= 24%
systematic errors EXPERIMENT
For the systematical error calculation the following errors are taken into account:
1.
11% - normalization to the

(charged pion analysis) ->
2.
10% - event mixing (background) ->
3.
20% - self-consistency check of efficiency matrices/acceptances ->

=

= 22.36%
or if one take into acount also error coming from the

, then

=

= 24.92%
Excess Function
yield in experiment in eta region: 1.25071e-07
yield in plutosim in eta region only from eta component 1.59329e-08
excess number yield_exp/yield_plutosim 7.84987
statistical error in eta region: 9.39296e-09
statistical error of ratio : 0.589534
systematical error in eta region 2.79659e-08
systematical error of ratio: 1.75523
statistical and systematical error in eta region 2.95011e-08
statistical and systematical error of ratio: 2.3158e-07
so the enhancement can be written in the following way:
7.85 +- 0.59(stat) +- 1.76(sys EXP)
for comparison here are the numbers from the kickplane analysis:
http://hades-wiki.gsi.de/cgi-bin/view/SimAna/ResultsForINPC#Excess_Function
--
YvonnePachmayer - 15 Oct 2007